Date/Time: 2018-04-06 05:29 (UTC)Posted by: [personal profile] morbane
morbane: pohutukawa blossom and leaves (Default)
This came up in another exchange, so I wanted to ask: what principles govern the situation when:

-a relationship is nominated, and one or more characters are nominated in a gender neutral form

-someone requests that relationship and has a strong preference as to the gender(s)

-someone offers that relationship and has a strong preference as to the gender(s)

-those two preferences clash.

Is the onus on a recipient to either nominate the gender variants they prefer, OR to request ambiguous relationships only in the cases where they are neutral / have *mild* preferences about what genders they will receive?

Or is the onus on a creator, in offering an ambiguous relationship, to be willing to create a fanwork that has the gender combination their recipient prefers (if such a preference is stated)?

Or something else?


For example, IDK, "group: Self-Emancipated Sex Bot/ Self-Emancipated Domestic Servant Android". Should a recipient be able to request that and specify that they only want m/m? Or should an author be able to offer that in the expectation that they can write whatever gender combination they like?


Full disclosure: I probably won't have time to participate in this fest, so my opinion is not super relevant here, but I think it is a question that is likely to come up and that is useful to consider before nominations begin, so that everyone can have the same expectation when nominating. I hope this is helpful and not out of line, and I'm sorry if it's the latter!
This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting

Profile

turingfest: (Default)
Turing Fest

July 2022

S M T W T F S
     12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31      

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags